<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Cricbuzz.com - Latest Comments in Cricbuzz.com: Mathews action tests ICC rule book</title><link>http://cricbuzzcom.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://cricbuzzcom.disqus.com/cricbuzzcom_mathews_action_tests_icc_rule_book/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:53:40 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Cricbuzz.com: Mathews action tests ICC rule book</title><link>http://www.cricbuzz.com/component/latest_cricket_news/Story/15353/#comment-10740952</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lets see who will suck..............except for INDIA, SRILANKA AND SOUTH AFRICA rest all the top teams have lost atleast one match in the league stages and INDIA is the only team which have won both the matches comprehensively.....That shows how poised they are....... and whom ever u r supporting apart from INDIA not is even going to go semis this time..................................&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pandoo</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:53:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cricbuzz.com: Mathews action tests ICC rule book</title><link>http://www.cricbuzz.com/component/latest_cricket_news/Story/15353/#comment-10734029</link><description>&lt;p&gt;in my opinion India are easily the best team in the tournament, but Sri Lanka look to be the dark horse.. and they are playing the best cricket in the whole tournament.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;but I must also mention, "akif" and "fucking pakistan is great", I really don't believe u two are actually pakistanis. Pakistanis I know are very gracious and hospitable people. I think you two are sick in the mind to bring in this kind of topics in a forum like this. We are all south asians and we should all be together united. that is where our true strength lies..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sri Lankan Patriot</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:51:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cricbuzz.com: Mathews action tests ICC rule book</title><link>http://www.cricbuzz.com/component/latest_cricket_news/Story/15353/#comment-10733146</link><description>&lt;p&gt;SRI LANKA NOW FIRE&lt;br&gt;KEEP U'R EYES ON JAYASURIYA&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SUBBRAMANIYAM</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 06:44:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cricbuzz.com: Mathews action tests ICC rule book</title><link>http://www.cricbuzz.com/component/latest_cricket_news/Story/15353/#comment-10732543</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That should be given as a six. Because, a boundary means, the end line of a ground. So anything that has done beyond the line should be given as a boundary.Moreover, he was so far inside from the boundary line. If he was doing that from the playing field, it was ok. But this cant be taken or admit as a bravery.&lt;br&gt;The law should change.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vivek Kumar</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 05:43:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cricbuzz.com: Mathews action tests ICC rule book</title><link>http://www.cricbuzz.com/component/latest_cricket_news/Story/15353/#comment-10731262</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes it is six umpire do not know rule in deep&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amit Chauhan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:39:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cricbuzz.com: Mathews action tests ICC rule book</title><link>http://www.cricbuzz.com/component/latest_cricket_news/Story/15353/#comment-10730075</link><description>&lt;p&gt;MR. Rahul  u can comment  on a nation or a group but dont u dare come on a religion &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carzy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:01:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cricbuzz.com: Mathews action tests ICC rule book</title><link>http://www.cricbuzz.com/component/latest_cricket_news/Story/15353/#comment-10728557</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually in the football, if  the ball (in the air) was crossing in the goal post.... it awarded a goal, in the same as cricket , ball was air the same as fielder was air .. so it should  be given six , but why the depended on law , third umpire should responsibility to give six.(batsmen favour)........ and after icc will consider the law expert (to create new law)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Knight</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:16:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cricbuzz.com: Mathews action tests ICC rule book</title><link>http://www.cricbuzz.com/component/latest_cricket_news/Story/15353/#comment-10727460</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i agree with u..&lt;br&gt;its really a fool decision by the match refree&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">javed</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:18:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cricbuzz.com: Mathews action tests ICC rule book</title><link>http://www.cricbuzz.com/component/latest_cricket_news/Story/15353/#comment-10727410</link><description>&lt;p&gt;whatever it is...&lt;br&gt;i think i should be called for SIX runs..........&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">javed</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:16:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cricbuzz.com: Mathews action tests ICC rule book</title><link>http://www.cricbuzz.com/component/latest_cricket_news/Story/15353/#comment-10726957</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i was trying to find this "almost catch"  in this article it says. Mendis as a bowler 16th over.. but in replay Melinga is doing the 16th over... would some one verify ?? which over was it??? thankx&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mandis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:56:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cricbuzz.com: Mathews action tests ICC rule book</title><link>http://www.cricbuzz.com/component/latest_cricket_news/Story/15353/#comment-10726451</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Its clearly Six.... What a dumb act by ampires and match referee... If i go to pavilion and from there i jump and push the ball inside the ropes, then its not six... As per the rules, even player can go to stands and from there jump and push the ball inside the ropes, then also not sixxxx.....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What a comedical act by them///&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pras</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:33:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cricbuzz.com: Mathews action tests ICC rule book</title><link>http://www.cricbuzz.com/component/latest_cricket_news/Story/15353/#comment-10722238</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is another kind of cheating invented by the  Srilankan player.....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jose</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:15:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cricbuzz.com: Mathews action tests ICC rule book</title><link>http://www.cricbuzz.com/component/latest_cricket_news/Story/15353/#comment-10720212</link><description>&lt;p&gt;IT MUST BE A SIX......!!!!&lt;br&gt;LEAVE OUT THE OTHER STUFF AND TALK CRICKET.....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tom cat</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:02:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cricbuzz.com: Mathews action tests ICC rule book</title><link>http://www.cricbuzz.com/component/latest_cricket_news/Story/15353/#comment-10717638</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think I saw a similar catch attempt from Chaminda Vaas in 1999 world cup, do not remember against who and which match... but it was one of the leagues, I believe. I wonder if I could get a glimpse on youtube.... :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nikhil</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:49:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cricbuzz.com: Mathews action tests ICC rule book</title><link>http://www.cricbuzz.com/component/latest_cricket_news/Story/15353/#comment-10711820</link><description>&lt;p&gt;why do read these... come and get the details u need and move off... why do u sneek through this and get pissed off...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prem_vgopal</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:12:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cricbuzz.com: Mathews action tests ICC rule book</title><link>http://www.cricbuzz.com/component/latest_cricket_news/Story/15353/#comment-10711769</link><description>&lt;p&gt;why do  read these... come and get the details u need and move off... why do u sneek through this and get pissed off... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prem_vgopal</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:11:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cricbuzz.com: Mathews action tests ICC rule book</title><link>http://www.cricbuzz.com/component/latest_cricket_news/Story/15353/#comment-10711735</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hmmm why do u read these... come and get the details u need... simple..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">prem_vgopal</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:10:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cricbuzz.com: Mathews action tests ICC rule book</title><link>http://www.cricbuzz.com/component/latest_cricket_news/Story/15353/#comment-10711400</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow another fielder will go beyond the boundary. catch n pop-up the ball ten times all being while jumping and so having his leg in the air, and throw it back to field. it won't be a six...ridiculous.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think ICC should change the rule.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Once a fielder crosses the boundary for any reason, and the ball though in the air is over the ropes, then if the fielder tries to pop back ball to the field, it should be a six.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The idea is the ball should not be over the ropes whether it is in the air or through the ground.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Critic</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:02:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cricbuzz.com: Mathews action tests ICC rule book</title><link>http://www.cricbuzz.com/component/latest_cricket_news/Story/15353/#comment-10710261</link><description>&lt;p&gt;SouthAfrica in good position for this World cup. All players are in form since IPL.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CricketCrazy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:36:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cricbuzz.com: Mathews action tests ICC rule book</title><link>http://www.cricbuzz.com/component/latest_cricket_news/Story/15353/#comment-10708242</link><description>&lt;p&gt;good thinking by young fielder. our indians should learn from that...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jayaram</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:44:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cricbuzz.com: Mathews action tests ICC rule book</title><link>http://www.cricbuzz.com/component/latest_cricket_news/Story/15353/#comment-10707802</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the best ever catch in the world cricket history&lt;br&gt;young sri lankan talent brilliant&lt;br&gt;sri lankans looking solid in t20 worldcup this year,great going&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nimantha</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:35:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>